United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Bowling Green
N. STIVERS, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.
John Buchanan initiated this pro se civil action.
Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis,
this Court must review the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2). For the reasons that follow, the Court
will dismiss this action.
SUMMARY OF COMPLAINT
initiated this action by filing a handwritten complaint. The
complaint states as follows:
This U.S. DISTRICT Court claim being made after acting upon
instruction's given from first claim taken on 6-18-2016.
Claim number 116cv-92gns., 
These are the instruction's; claim cannot be made until
first making application to ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE
COURTS for relief.
These instructions were acted upon. An application was made
to the ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE. A request for lump sum check to
be given me because of serve with Department of
Correction's inmate number 119031.
I was not replyed to an answer was not received from the
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE and no lump sum check sent. It has been
over 1 year. I applied in June 2017.
STATEMENT: The U.S. GOVERNMENT did not pay me lump sum check
this after serve with Department of Correction's dates:
7-20-1993 to 4-15-2014.
Dated: 9-18-2018, Amount: $120, 000.
also attached a supplement to his complaint which states:
“The reason I was late applying for my lump sum check,
I wrote to several government offices for information on what
I should do to receive check I got no reply from these. In
June of 2014 I had a heart attack . . . I kept trying to
figure out what to do, resorted to claim with District Court.
I was told what to do then, apply Admin Office.”
Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court
must review this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). On
review, a district court must dismiss a case at any time if
it determines that the action is frivolous or malicious,
fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or
seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from
such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
order to survive dismissal for failure to state a claim,
“a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter,
accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is
plausible on its face.'” Ashcroft v.
Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl.
Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). “A
claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads
factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable
inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct
alleged.” Id. (citing Twombly, 550
U.S. at 556). “[A] district court must (1) view the
complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and
(2) take all well-pleaded factual ...