Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mattingly v. Henderson County Healthcare Corporation-Two

United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Owensboro Division

January 9, 2018



          Joseph H. McKinley, Jr., Chief Judge United States District Court.

         This matter is before the Court on a motion by Defendant, Henderson County Health Care Corporation - Two, for summary judgment [DN 32]. Fully briefed, these matters are ripe for decision.


         Before the Court may grant a motion for summary judgment, it must find that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a). The moving party bears the initial burden of specifying the basis for its motion and identifying that portion of the record that demonstrates the absence of a genuine issue of material fact. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). Once the moving party satisfies this burden, the non-moving party thereafter must produce specific facts demonstrating a genuine issue of fact for trial. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 (1986).

         Although the Court must review the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, the non-moving party must do more than merely show that there is some “metaphysical doubt as to the material facts.” Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586 (1986). Instead, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require the non-moving party to present specific facts showing that a genuine factual issue exists by “citing to particular parts of materials in the record” or by “showing that the materials cited do not establish the absence . . . of a genuine dispute[.]” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c)(1). “The mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the [non-moving party's] position will be insufficient; there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for the [non-moving party].” Anderson, 477 U.S. at 252. It is against this standard that the Court reviews the following facts.


         Defendant, Henderson County Heath Care Corporation - Two (“HC-2”), is a Kentucky not-for-profit corporation that operates two apartment complexes located in Henderson, Kentucky, Redbanks Towers and Pleasant Pointe Apartments. Plaintiff, Kacie Mattingly, was hired by Defendant on February 26, 2009, as a Leasing Consultant. During her employment, Mattingly was promoted to Assistant Property Manager at Redbanks Towers and then to Property Manager at Redbanks Towers effective April 1, 2013.

         Sharon Combs (“Combs”) was the Executive Director at HC-2 and Mattingly's supervisor. In early 2013, Combs announced her intention to retire, and several people applied for the job of Executive Director, including Mattingly and Wendy Orr. HC-2's Board of Directors hired Orr as the Executive Director. Orr started as Executive Director on May 6, 2013.

         In early May 2013, Mattingly requested leave from work for approximately four to six weeks beginning in June 2013. She made her request according to the employee handbook which required at least 30 days' notice. Orr told Mattingly she should have provided more notice and that the handbook was merely a “suggestion, ” not a guideline. Mattingly requested the leave to have surgery to remove excess skin following her significant weight loss. Orr granted Mattingly's leave, and Mattingly was off from work for approximately four weeks. While on leave for her surgery, Mattingly applied for short-term disability. Mattingly testified that Orr failed to properly fax documentation to the insurance company, which delayed her benefits until after she returned from leave.

         In October of 2013, Mattingly underwent a hysterectomy and returned to work within a week of the surgery. Mattingly also underwent an MRI and CAT scan during that time period in an effort to determine the cause of her balance problems and slurred speech. Orr testified that she was aware of the doctor's appointments related to Mattingly's balance problems. In April of 2014, Mattingly was diagnosed with Friedreich's ataxia which is a neurological disorder that affects Mattingly's ability to walk, causes balance issues, and slightly affects her speech. The condition will worsen over time, and Mattingly will eventually lose dexterity. There is no cure.

         Mattingly testified that she informed Orr of her diagnosis in April of 2014. Orr asked Mattingly how it would affect her work, and she responded that there was no way to know. Mattingly never asked for any accommodation to help her perform her work. Mattingly does not recall any specific conversations thereafter about her disability.

         On December 2, 2014, Defendant terminated Mattingly's employment. The written notice provided to Mattingly indicated that, “[d]ue to budget constraints, your position has been eliminated.” Orr testified that the budget for Redbanks Towers called for having no more than 10 vacancies, and its main source of revenue was rent from apartments including HUD subsidies. According to Orr, she made the decision to eliminate Mattingly's position due to financial reasons because Redbanks Towers had approximately 15 vacancies and the cost to renovate those apartments to get them ready to rent was high, cash flow was tight, and HC-2 was getting ready to start a 401k plan for employees, which would be an additional cost. Mattingly's duties were shifted to Orr and the receptionist at Redbanks Towers, Tiffany Berrong. In June of 2015, Berrong's employment was terminated and Melissa Stanley, the Property Manager at Redbanks Regency Apartments, assumed the leasing agent duties of Mattingly's former position. In September 2016, Orr hired a part-time employee, Gigi Gentry, to perform leasing paper for Redbanks Towers.

         As a result of her termination, Mattingly brought this wrongful termination suit claiming that HC-2 terminated her because of her disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”) and the Kentucky Civil Rights Act (“KCRA”), KRS § 344.040; terminated her in retaliation for exercising her rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”); and unlawfully interfered with the exercise of her rights protected by the FMLA.

         Defendant filed this motion for summary judgment arguing that (1) Plaintiff cannot satisfy the second and fifth elements of her prima facie case in her ADA claim, (2) Plaintiff failed to prove that the Defendant's legitimate, non-discriminatory reason was pretextual; and (3) Plaintiff ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.