Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Thakur v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n.

Supreme Court of Kentucky

October 23, 2014

ADRIENNE A. THAKUR, MOVANT
v.
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENT

JOHN D. MINTON, JR., CHIEF JUSTICE. All sitting. All concur.

IN SUPREME COURT

OPINION AND ORDER

John D. Minton, Jr., Chief Justice

Pursuant to SCR 3.480(2), the negotiated sanction rule, Movant, Adrienne A. Thakur, KBA Number 92703, moves this Court to impose upon her a five-year suspension, along with additional conditions, to resolve the . professional misconduct charges contained in KBA File 21456. The Kentucky Bar Association (KBA) has no objection to Movant's request.

Movant was admitted to the practice of law in Kentucky on October 17, 2008, and her bar roster address is 385 Georgetown Street, Lexington, KY 40508. For the reasons set forth herein, we grant Movant's motion.

Page 436

Movant was employed as an associate attorney by the law firm of Heniy Watz, Raine & Marino, PLLC, in January, 2009. In July, 2010, Movant began to steal funds, some of which belonged to the law firm and some of which belonged to clients. Eventually, the stolen funds totaled $8,858.00. When the theft was discovered, Movant resigned from the firm. On March 15, 2013, Movant signed a promissory note by which she undertook the obligation to repay " the funds she wrongfully diverted" on or before July 31, 2013. The note was not paid in full until November 5, 2013.

On January 16, 2014, the Inquiry Commission issued a three-count charge against Movant. Count I alleged that Movant violated SCR 3.130-1.15(a)[1] by concealing from the firm the receipt of funds from, or for, certain clients and by not turning over said funds to the firm. Count II alleged that Movant violated SCR 3.130-1.15(b)[2] by not notifying the firm of the receipt of funds from, or for, certain clients and by not turning over the funds for deposit into the appropriate account. Count III alleged that Movant violated SCR 3.130-8.4(c)[3] by concealing from the firm the receipt of funds from clients and diverting the funds for her own personal benefit instead of turning them over for deposit into the appropriate account.

Appellant admits that she is guilty of each of the above ethical violations. As punishment, Movant requests a five-year suspension from the practice of law, with the additional conditions that she immediately be evaluated by KYLAP and follow any recommendations made by that office, and that she attend the Office of Bar Counsel's Ethics and Professionalism Enhancement Program (EPEP) and pass the exam at the conclusion of that program before she applies for reinstatement. The KBA presents no objection to Movant's proposed sanction.

The negotiated sanction rule provides that " [t]he Court may consider negotiated sanctions of disciplinary investigations, complaints or charges if the parties agree." SCR 3.480(2). Specifically, " the member and Bar Counsel [must] agree upon the specifics of the facts, the rules violated, and the appropriate sanction." Id. Upon receiving a motion under this Rule, " [t]he Court may approve the sanction agreed to by the parties, or may remand the case for hearing or other proceedings specified in the order of remand." Id. Thus, acceptance of the proposed negotiated sanction still falls within the discretion of the Court.

In support of the negotiated sanction the KBA cites us to James v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n, 397 S.W.3d 405 (Ky. 2013), and Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Hawkins, 260 S.W.3d 337 (Ky. 2008). In James the attorney was charged with multiple rule violations, including SCR 3.130-1.15(a) and SCR 3.130-8.4(c) for conduct which included misuse of

Page 437

client funds. For these violations the attorney received a negotiated five-year suspension and was ordered to submit to an evaluation and ongoing monitoring by KYLAP during the suspension period. In Hawkins the attorney misused client funds by cashing, and retaining for himself, the proceeds of thirteen settlement checks payable to clients for which he received a five-year suspension.

After reviewing the allegations, the Movant's previous disciplinary record, her restitution efforts, her willingness to cooperate with KYLAP and undergo supplemental ethics training, and the cases cited by Bar Counsel, this Court concludes that the discipline proposed by Movant, and agreed to ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.