Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Branham v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n

Supreme Court of Kentucky

April 17, 2014

CLIFFORD BRANHAM, MOVANT
v.
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENT

Released for Publication April 29, 2014.

TO BE PUBLISHED

John D. Minton Jr., CHIEF JUSTICE. All sitting. All concur.

IN SUPREME COURT

OPINION AND ORDER

John D. Minton Jr., CHIEF JUSTICE.

Movant, Clifford A. Branham, KBA No. 88852,[1] admits to violating the Kentucky Rules of Professional Conduct and moves this Court to impose the sanction of permanent disbarment. The KBA has no objection to Branham's motion.

I. BACKGROUND

On December 28, 2009, Branham was suspended from the practice of law for failing to pay a late fee associated with his 2009-10 Bar dues. He has not since been restored to membership.

The Inquiry Commission has charged Branham with three counts of misconduct based upon the allegations contained in KBA file 19993. Counts I and II stem from criminal proceedings against Branham in Fayette Circuit Court. In that case, Branham pled guilty to four counts of theft by failure to make required disposition of property over $10,000, which were amended down to Class D felonies for

Page 136

failure to make required disposition of property over $500.00 but less than $10,000. See KRS 514.070. The indictment alleged that Branham owned a title business, Cornerstone Title Services, Inc., and that he intentionally failed to make required payments to four of his clients. He was sentenced to two years in prison on each count to be run consecutively for a total of eight years. He was also ordered to pay restitution in the amount of 241,812.38 should he be granted parole.

Based on the facts giving rise to Branham's criminal conviction, the Inquiry Commission charged him with two counts of misconduct. Count I charged the Branham violated SCR 3.130-8.4(b), which provides that it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to " commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects." The Commission asserts that Branham violated this rule by committing the crime of theft by failure to make required disposition of property over $500.00 but less than $10,000, to which he pled guilty. Count II charged that Branham violated SCR 3.130-8.4(c), which stated that it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to " engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation." The Commission claims that Branham violated this rule by failing to make the required disposition of the funds he took from the clients and converting the funds to his own use.

In addition to the two counts of misconduct arising from Branham's criminal conviction, the Inquiry Commission charged Branham with a third count of misconduct relating to his failure to respond to its Charge against him. Count III charged that Branham violated SCR 3.130-8.1(b), which provides that, in connection with a disciplinary matter, a lawyer shall not " knowingly fail to respond to a lawful demand for information." The Commission asserts that Branham violated this rule by failing to respond to the Inquiry Commission's Charge despite receiving a warning that failure to respond could result in additional charges.

Branham admits that his actions were " serious and egregious" violations of the above-stated Rules of Professional Conduct.[2] Therefore, he requests that the Court grant him leave to resign from the KBA under terms of permanent disbarment pursuant to SCR ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.