Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Roach v. Hiland

United States District Court, Sixth Circuit

July 8, 2013

ANTOINE ROACH Plaintiff,
v.
STEVE HILAND et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on two pending motions by Plaintiff Antoine Roach. Plaintiff filed a "Petition for Name Change" on a Commonwealth of Kentucky form (DN 16). The Court cannot discern any connection this request may have to the claims alleged in this 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 action. In any event, this Court does not have jurisdiction to grant Plaintiff a name change. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for name change (DN 16) is DENIED.

Plaintiff also filed a motion for extension of time to "complete my opposition to the defendants['] answer" (DN 18). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7(a)(7) allows a reply to an answer to be filed only if the Court orders one. The Court did not order Plaintiff to file a reply to Defendants' answer in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for extension of time (DN 18) is DENIED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.