Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Walthers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

United States District Court, Sixth Circuit

April 30, 2013

JESSE RAY WALTHERS, Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DAVID L. BUNNING, District Judge.

Jesse Ray Walthers is an inmate confined in the United States Penitentiary ("USP")-Lewisburg, located in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.[1] Proceeding without an attorney, Walthers has filed a civil rights Complaint [R.1] asserting claims arising from personal injuries which he sustained on July 11, 2011, while confined in the USP-McCreary in Pine Knot, Kentucky.

The Court must conduct a preliminary review of Walthers' Complaint because he has been granted permission to pay the filing fee in installments and because he asserts claims against government officials. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2), 1915A. A district court must dismiss any claim that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 608 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199 (2007). The Court evaluates Walthers' Complaint under a more lenient standard because he is not represented by an attorney. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007); Burton v. Jones, 321 F.3d 569, 573 (6th Cir. 2003), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199 (2007). At this stage, the Court "must construe the complaint in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, and accept all of [his] factual allegations as true." Bloch v. Ribar, 156 F.3d 673, 677 (6th Cir. 1998) (citations omitted).

Having reviewed Walthers' Complaint, the Court will dismiss it for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Walthers may pursue his claims, which fall under the Inmate Accident Compensation Act ("IACA") 18 U.S.C. § 4126, at the correctional institution where he is confined, in the manner prescribed by 28 C.F.R. § 301.303(a).

BACKGROUND

Walthers alleges that on July 11, 2011, while working as a food service employee at USP-McCreary, Defendant Brown, the Food Service Supervisor, instructed him to load food onto a food cart and return it to the food service area. While Walthers was loading food onto the cart in front of the food service area, the cart "tipped over" on him, causing an injury to his head which required 10 stitches and bruising over his back and neck. Walthers claims that the food carts were damaged and malfunctioning, and that two days after the incident, Defendant Solomon, the Food Service Administrator, told Walthers that he (Solomon) was aware that the food carts had been broken for some time. [R. 1, p. 3] Walthers contends that Defendants Solomon and Brown acted with gross negligence by requiring him to operate a food cart which they knew was damaged, unsafe, and in need of repair.

Walthers further alleges that after he was injured on July 11, 2011, USP-McCreary Nurse Miracle refused to take pictures of his injuries because "she didn't want to lose her job, " and that Defendant K. Bennett-Baker, the USP-McCreary Physician's Assistant, ignored his medical complaints and "... refused to have me seen by an outside specialist after my x-rays were clear...." [ Id. ] Walthers claims that after Physician's Assistant Jennifer West took over his medical care, he continued to receive nothing more than a prescription for ibuprofen. [ Id. ]

Walthers acknowledges that his X-rays were determined to be "clear, " but claims that he continues to suffer chronic headaches, neck pain, and numbness in his left arm. [ Id., p. 7] Walthers states that he has "continually complained of the lingering effects to medical from that date until the present (8-20-2012), " id. p. 3, [2] but that the medical staffs at both USP-McCreary and at FCI-Talladega refused to allow him to be examined by a specialist despite his complaints of headaches, neck pain, and numbness in his left arm. [ Id., p. 7]

Walthers states that he completed the three-step Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") administrative remedy process as to his claims. [ Id., p. 4, § IV] In his Request for an Informal Resolution, Walthers demanded $100, 000 in damages for his injuries. On August 24, 2011, Richard B. Ives, then Warden of USP-McCreary, denied Walthers' request for a formal remedy, informing him that he must pursue his claims through the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680. [R. 1-1, p. 6]

In his appeal to the BOP's Mid-Atlantic Regional Office ("MARO"), Walthers stated that a tort claim examiner had informed him "that the tort claim was not the appropriate remedy. Furthermore, the Warden's response does not fully and accurately address my issue." [ Id., p. 7]

The MARO subsequently denied Walthers' BP-10 appeal, stating:

Investigation of your complaint reveals you are receiving appropriate medical treatment and you continue to have access to sick call for your concerns. Regarding to your request for compensation, the Administrative Remedy Program does not provide monetary compensation of this nature. Please refer to the Federal Tort Claims Act for that purpose. In addition, you are encouraged to continue to work with your primary care provider team for other health care related issues and concerns.

[ Id., p. 8 (no date specified on the denial)]

Walthers attached no documentation relative to an appeal to the BOP Central Office, but he stated in his Complaint form that on March 12, 2012, he filed an appeal to the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.