APPEAL FROM GRAVES CIRCUIT COURT HONORABLE TIMOTHY C. STARK, JUDGE ACTION NO. 11-CR-00064
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thompson, Judge:
RENDERED: APRIL 19, 2013; 10:00 A.M.
BEFORE: DIXON, MOORE AND THOMPSON, JUDGES.
Charles R. Reilly appeals the denial of his motion to enter the deferred prosecution program provided for in KRS 218A.14151. He contends that the circuit court had authority to decide that the prosecutor's reasons for denying deferred prosecution were not substantial and compelling and that deferred prosecution should have been ordered. We conclude that Reilly's interpretation of KRS 218A.14151 is erroneous and would render the statute unconstitutional under the separation of powers doctrine. For those reasons, we affirm.
In April 2011, Reilly was indicted for the offenses of possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, second or greater offense; possession of a controlled substance, third degree, second or greater offense; possession of marijuana; and possession of drug paraphernalia. In June 2011, he submitted a written request to the Graves County Commonwealth Attorney asking that his prosecution be deferred.
At a hearing, defense counsel informed the circuit court that he anticipated that the prosecutor would deny Reilly's request for deferred prosecution. He requested that the trial court order the prosecutor to permit Reilly to enter the deferred prosecution program. The court denied Reilly's request concluding that absent the prosecutor's agreement, it had no authority to order deferred prosecution.
In 2011, through House Bill 463, the General Assembly made sweeping changes to our penal system. Consistent with the goal of rehabilitation versus incarceration for drug-related offenses, deferred prosecution is a permissible disposition for first or second time offenders. KRS 218A.1415(2)(b). The procedures and substance of the deferred prosecution program are found in KRS 218A.14151, which provides in part:
(1) A defendant charged with his or her first or second offense under KRS 218A.1415 may enter a deferred prosecution program subject to the following provisions:
(a) The defendant requests deferred prosecution in writing on an application created under KRS 27A.099, and the prosecutor agrees[.] .
(2) If a prosecutor denies a defendant's request to enter a deferred prosecution program, the prosecutor shall state on the record the substantial and compelling reasons why the defendant cannot be safely and effectively supervised in the community, is not amenable to community-based treatment, or poses a significant risk to public safety.
If a defendant does not enter the deferred prosecution program, KRS 218A.1415(2)(d) provides that "he or she shall be subject to a period of presumptive probation, unless a court determines the defendant is not eligible for presumptive probation as defined in KRS ...