Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dome v. Maggard

February 26, 1954

DOME
v.
MAGGARD ET AL.



Per Curiam

The only question presented is whether the appellee Bill Maggard was properly absolved from liability for goods sold and delivered to the Blackey Wholesale Company by the appellant. On conflicting evidence the jury found, in effect, that the appellee Bill Maggard was not a partner in the firm doing business as Blackey Wholesale Company at the time the goods were sold, and that the appellant had had proper notice of his withdrawal from the partnership before the goods were sold and delivered to N. T. Rowland, doing business as Blackey Wholesale Company. Maggard formerly had been Rowland's partner, and the appellant had been one of the partnership's suppliers. The jury found against Rowland for the full amount of appellant's claim, $995.65, but absolved Maggard of liability. On review of the case, we find no prejudicial error.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

19540226

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.